I recently visited the Didi-99 headquarters in Sao Paolo. In Part 1, talked about how driver needs and services are an area that appears to be particularly different in Brazil vs. China. Here are some other differences.
Difference with China #2: How much to localize is an important question for ride-sharing globally.
Uber, unfortunately, has become the gold standard for how not to go global as a ride-sharing company. They rolled out their services around the world in a mostly standardized fashion, with the tech and management significantly centralized to San Francisco. That made sense as data technology and software scale and expand geographically very easily. And combining this with local data is a powerful approach. It has really worked for Facebook and Google globally.
But Uber got beat virtually everywhere by local ride-sharing companies. Ola won in India, Grab in SE Asia, Didi in China. And so on. It turns out ride-sharing can be a pretty local business. Plus having local. owner-managers can be a real strength.
Didi, by and large, avoided this approach by investing (along with Softbank) in local champions around the world. And since 2016, Uber has retreated back to the USA while the Didi Alliance has become dominant in much of the world.
Now, however, Didi is going international itself. Especially in Brazil, Mexico, Australia and Japan. And ironically, it is now going head-to-head with Uber in two of their largest remaining international markets: Brazil and Mexico.
So how will Didi go international directly?
I spoke with Davi Miyake Dos Santos (Head of Strategy & Planning and General Manager) about this in Sao Paolo And then later with Benjamin Wang (International Business Chief of Staff) at the Beijing headquarters. One of the perks of my writing / research / professor role is I get to meet smart people like Davi and Benjamin all the time. It’s a real pleasure.
My question was: how do you go global as a ride-sharing business?
- How much do you centralize to headquarters? Technology? Data? Product development? Management? Decision-making? Budgeting? What about ownership?
- How much do you localize in each geography? How much authority do you give to local management? Can staff in Sao Paolo launch new driver services on their own? Can they change code?
Every multinational deals with these questions. But ride-sharing and local software-enabled platforms are a new type of business. The answer is not obvious.
Thus far, I think this question has not been too much of an issue for Didi. They aren’t engaged in any fierce fights around the world (yet). Plus, data and users (drivers and riders) are local by definition. So that will naturally lead to a unique and very local view of the Brazil market (thank god for big data). And certain things like capital-raising and R&D (new ride-sharing vehicles, autonomous vehicles) will make sense centralized in Beijing.
But what about analytics, AI, customized products / services and management incentives?
There is going to be a tendency to just take the China services (Luxe, Express, etc.) and then port those to Brazil. But that could leave you open to a disruptive local product. Go-Jek did this in Indonesia by focusing on moped and not cars for ride-sharing. So localization of product development is a question. Can the Brazil team create entirely new services and pricing strategies in Brazil that we don’t see in China? Note: Jack Ma did this to eBay by offering free services to merchants on Alibaba.
Another question is management ownership and independence. Can the local team build on their own or are lots of decisions run through Beijing? KFC famously gave Samuel Su free reign and lots of cash to build the KFC business in China – and he totally changed the menu. McDonalds, in contrast, held a pretty tight leash on their China operations and did not want the look or menu changed significantly. Today, KFC dwarfs McDonalds in China.
And there is the big question of management and ownership.
My standard question when talking to multinationals operating in China is: where do the decision-makers and / or owners live? Where do their kids go to school? If the decision-makers haven’t moved their lives and their families to China, I discount them. You just can’t dabble in or commute into a developing economy, especially hyper-competitive China. Back when Didi was fighting Uber for China, the number I kept pointing to was 4,000. Didi had around 4,000 staff on the ground and living permanently in China. Uber had like 400. And Travis was running the show from San Francisco.
Difference with China #3: Safety, efficiency and growth are big priorities in Brazil this year.
Safety in ride-sharing has become a huge focus and priority in China this year. But it has long been an issue in Brazil, Mexico and much of Latin America. Of the world’s 50 most dangerous cities, around 40 are in Latin America. And like 25 of them are in Brazil.
Safety for riders and drivers is an ongoing issue in Brazil. Fortunately, ride-sharing should soon be the safest form of transportation. It is not anonymous. Everything can be tracked. And you can do real-time monitoring. In Brazil, ride-sharing will certainly be safer than walking and taking trains, buses, and taxis. Davi mentioned safety is their big priority in Brazil right now.
Organic growth is another priority in Brazil ride-sharing right now. And that is a difference with China (everyone is already signed-up and public transportation is pretty great). Brazil is way underserved in terms of transportation. Davi mentioned Didi is expanding into hundreds of municipalities in Brazil this year. There is a big growth runway in Brazil.
Keep in mind, Brazil is a really big country. And car ownership is not ubiquitous. In this, Brazil is more similar to China than the USA. It is a huge geography where many (especially the young) have never owned a car. In addition to geographic expansion, there may be a real opportunity to leapfrog car ownership.
Ok. Those are the three main differences I noted. In Part 3, I will go into my favorite question: Uber vs. Didi. But this time in Brazil.
Cheers from Peking University. And thanks for reading – jeff
I write, speak and consult about how to win (and not lose) in digital strategy and transformation.
I am the founder of TechMoat Consulting, a boutique consulting firm that helps retailers, brands, and technology companies exploit digital change to grow faster, innovate better and build digital moats. Get in touch here.
I host Tech Strategy, a podcast and subscription newsletter detailing the strategies of the best digital businesses in the US, China and Asia.
My book series Moats and Marathons is one-of-a-kind framework for building and measuring competitive advantages in digital businesses.
With my subscription newsletter, you will:
Get a deeper understanding of the strategies and business models of the best digital companies.
Get specific frameworks for measuring competitive advantage in digital businesses and for traditional businesses doing digital transformation.
Get an edge in predicting what is going to happen next and who is going to win.
Note: This content (articles, podcasts, website info) is not investment advice. The information and opinions from me and any guests may be incorrect. The numbers and information may be wrong. The views expressed may no longer be relevant or accurate. Investing is risky. Do your own research.